Week 6 College Football Bet Guide: Fallica’s Picks & Upset Odds

Week 6 College Football Bet Guide: Fallica’s Picks & Upset Odds
Arief Setiawan / Okt, 6 2025 / Sports

When Chris 'The Bear' Fallica, senior analyst for Fox Sports, released his Week 6 predictions on , the college football betting world took notice. Fallica’s "Bear Bets" boast a 17‑10‑1 record this season, and his latest slate pinpoints several ranked clashes that could swing billions in wagers. College football betting enthusiasts now have a menu of spreads, totals and underdog specials, from Texas in Gainesville to Purdue in West Lafayette.

Expert Picks Overview

Fallica opened with a wary eye on the Texas Longhorns traveling to face the Florida Gators. He warned that the Longhorns, ranked No. 9, have slipped to 32nd nationally in yards per play (6.2 YPP) and that quarterback Arch Manning is only 61.3% efficient. "This could go very badly for a Texas offense that’s still searching for a rhythm," Fallica said.

Another marquee pick was the clash between the Ohio State Buckeyes and the Minnesota Golden Gophers. Fallica projected a comfortable Ohio State win, noting the Buckeyes’ defense ranks among the nation’s top‑10 for EPA per dropback.

He also highlighted a potential upset: Purdue at Illinois. Even though the Boilermakers sit at No. 22, Fallica believes the Purdue Boilermakers can exploit Illinois’ defensive woes, especially after Illinois’ surprising win over USC.

Key Matchups & Statistical Insights

In the Gulf Coast showdown, Fallica noted Florida’s defensive consistency: a mean 23.0 PPG allowed on the road against LSU and Miami. "At home, the Gators should make Texas look even smaller," he added.

For the Michigan State‑Nebraska game, Fallica warned that a Michigan State defense that gave up 390 passing yards to Boston College and 523 yards to USC could be in trouble. He predicts Dylan Raiola will spearhead the Huskers’ attack, citing Nebraska’s recent 101‑yard passing limit against Michigan.

The Ohio State‑Minnesota duel boils down to the Buckeyes’ dominant pass rush versus a Gophers ground game that averages just 3.3 yards per carry (108th nationally). Analysts expect the 42.5 total‑points line to tilt toward a defensive slugfest.

FanDuel Research’s Betting Opportunities

Riley Thomas of FanDuel Research echoed many of Fallica’s concerns and added his own angles. He advocated taking the Under 19.5 for Texas total points, citing the Longhorns’ 32nd‑ranked YPP and their inability to convert on third down.

Thomas also favored Ohio State covering the -23.5 spread, arguing the Buckeyes’ defense has limited opponents to the 10th‑fewest EPA per dropback, which should suppress Minnesota’s scoring chances.

Another FanDuel highlight: the overall game total for the featured Ohio State‑Minnesota matchup sits at Under 46.5, a figure Thomas believes will hold given both teams’ proclivity for field‑goal range scores when early drives stall.

Upset Picks Identified by Covers.com

Shifting to the underdog board, Covers.com singled out three prime upset bets: Purdue (+300) at Illinois, Maryland (+198) at Virginia Tech, and Cal (+124) at Stanford. The Boilermakers’ case rests on a full week of rest after a weather‑delayed loss to Notre Dame and solid metrics – 21st in quality‑drive rate and 26th in yards gained.

Illinois’ defense, meanwhile, ranks 126th in dropback success rate and 101st in quality‑drive allowance, making it fertile ground for Purdue quarterback Ryan Browne to thrive.

Analysts also emphasized a "look‑ahead" benefit: Purdue’s victory would set them up against Ohio State the following weekend, a scenario that could dramatically reshape the Big Ten race.

What to Watch Moving Forward

Beyond the immediate wagers, bettors should monitor two developing storylines. First, the performance of Arch Manning in the Texas‑Florida game will likely set the tone for the Longhorns’ season trajectory. A solid showing could revive confidence in Texas’ spread bets, while another sluggish outing may push the market toward deeper under bets.

Second, the cascading effect of any Purdue upset will reverberate through the Big Ten bowl selection process. A Boilermakers win could force Ohio State to confront a more resilient opponent earlier than expected, potentially influencing the Buckeyes’ odds in the conference championship.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does Fallica’s “Bear Bets” track record affect Week 6 betting confidence?

Fallica’s season record of 17‑10‑1 gives his picks statistical weight; bettors often allocate larger units to analysts with winning percentages above .600. While past success doesn’t guarantee future results, his history of identifying undervalued spreads adds credibility to his Week 6 recommendations.

What makes the Texas‑Florida total points Under 19.5 a compelling bet?

Texas ranks 32nd in yards per play and has struggled to sustain drives, while Florida’s defense has limited opponents to 23.0 PPG on the road. The low yardage output and strong defensive front suggest the Longhorns will have trouble reaching 20 points.

Why is Purdue considered a top upset candidate despite a recent loss?

Purdue’s metrics – 21st in quality‑drive rate and 26th in yards per play – remain strong, and a full week of rest after the weather‑delayed Notre Dame game could restore rhythm. Coupled with Illinois’ 126th‑ranked dropback success, the matchup favors a Purdue upset at +300 odds.

What impact could an Ohio State win over Minnesota have on the Big Ten race?

A decisive Buckeyes victory would solidify Ohio State’s hold on the West division and push them into a favorable spot for the conference championship. It would also widen the gap with Purdue, making the Boilermakers’ path to the title more difficult unless they pull off an upset.

How should bettors approach the Michigan State‑Nebraska game given Fallica’s comments?

Fallica warned that Michigan State’s defense has given up high yardage against top teams. Nebraska’s recent showing, limiting Michigan to 101 passing yards, suggests the Cornhuskers could dominate. Betting the Nebraska moneyline or a spread favoring them appears prudent.